Liv Bank · Q3_2026_Liv_1
AiRi Composite Score
Piloting
- Data3.57
- Strategy3.55
- Talent3.05
- Payments1.10
- Infra1.90
- Change2.00
Domain maturity radar
hover for insightGap-to-target (lowest first)
What it means
ROI was estimated at project kickoff but nobody tracked whether it materialized. Leadership hears 'we saved 2,000 hours' but nobody can tell the CFO whether that translated into headcount reduction, throughput increase, or margin improvement. Hours saved is not value captured. The data science team is stretched across multiple pilots, delivering none at production quality. Data infrastructure supports the pilot use case but breaks when a second domain is added. There is a growing 'pilot zoo' that consumes budget without scaling.
Next steps
Implement standard value measurement with banking-specific baselines: false positive rate before/after, approval rates before/after, cost-per-transaction, time-to-decision, and financial attribution for each. Invest in MLOps foundations: standardized pipelines, model registry, and API-first integration. Consolidate the portfolio — kill low-impact pilots and redirect to 2-3 high-value initiatives with clear production paths. A bank with 3 models in production is more mature than a bank with 15 pilots.
Domain breakdown
| Domain | Maturity | vs. composite | Coverage | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Strategy & Governance | 3.55 | +0.93 | 8/8 | 9.0 |
| Data & Foundation Architecture | 3.57 | +0.95 | 4/4 | 10.0 |
| AI Talent & Capability Building | 3.05 | +0.43 | 4/4 | 7.0 |
| Model Lifecycle & MLOps | 2.85 | +0.23 | 4/4 | 9.0 |
| Responsible AI & Ethics | 2.67 | +0.05 | 4/4 | 10.0 |
| AI Value Measurement & ROI | 3.00 | +0.38 | 4/4 | 9.0 |
| Change Management & Adoption | 2.00 | -0.62 | 4/4 | 5.0 |
| Enterprise AI Infrastructure | 1.90 | -0.72 | 4/4 | 10.0 |
| Customer Experience & Engagement | 2.27 | -0.35 | 4/4 | 12.0 |
| Payments Intelligence | 1.10 | -1.52 | 4/4 | 8.0 |
Sutherland recommendations
Advanced governance. Industry leadership potential. Scale through ecosystem.
Approach: Design AI-first operating model with innovation partnerships
Industry-leading data architecture. Self-service analytics. Autonomous governance.
Approach: Implement data mesh with domain-driven ownership model
Solid AI team with defined structure. Scale through CoE model.
Approach: Build dedicated AI CoE with specialized roles and governance
Operational monitoring. <2-week deployment cycles. Self-healing basics.
Approach: Deploy automated retraining, A/B testing, monitoring at scale
Solid responsible AI program. Operationalize continuous monitoring and governance.
Approach: Deploy continuous bias monitoring and automated governance at scale
Systematic value measurement. Focus on cost optimization and portfolio management.
Approach: Implement AI FinOps for cost per inference and portfolio optimization
Structured change emerging. 76% adopt AI with training vs 25% without (S&P Global).
Approach: Launch AI adoption program with champion networks and incentives
Basic AI infrastructure exists. Provisioning slow and reactive. No FinOps.
Approach: Deploy cloud AI services with automated provisioning and basic monitoring